Important decisions cannot live only in email, meetings and disconnected tools
AI approvals, supplier exceptions, risk acceptances, policy deviations, control waivers and cyber investment decisions all need a clear record. When scrutiny arrives, it should be easy to show what was decided, why it was decided, what evidence was used, who approved it and when it will be reviewed.
Trace is for the decisions where the outcome is not enough. You need the reasoning, evidence and governance trail as well.
Use Trace where the decision trail matters
Trace creates the record you need later
Without Trace, decisions are often spread across emails, meeting notes, ticket comments, spreadsheets, documents and risk registers. The decision may be known, but the reasoning is hard to reconstruct.
With Trace, each decision has a structured record of context, evidence, policy alignment, approvals, rationale, actions, owners, conditions and review dates.
A practical workflow for defensible decisions
Start where scrutiny is highest
Most Trace engagements begin with one high-friction decision type. Choose the workflow that creates the most manual effort, the most uncertainty or the highest need for defensibility.
Common starting points:
-
Risk acceptance
-
Supplier exceptions
-
AI approvals
-
Policy exceptions
-
Control waivers
-
Audit-significant decisions
Decision Defensibility Diagnostic
In a focused diagnostic, MyRISK maps one critical decision workflow, identifies evidence and rationale gaps, and recommends the first Trace workflow to pilot.
Best-fit organisations:
-
A decision workflow map
-
A defensibility gap summary
-
Evidence pack recommendations
-
A recommended pilot workflow
-
A practical implementation path
